In keeping with the upcoming holiday season, enjoy this floral candy cane:
What is it?
Answer and another photo on Monday!
In keeping with the upcoming holiday season, enjoy this floral candy cane:
What is it?
Answer and another photo on Monday!
I hate to be the downer this week, given Bert and Holly’s inspired posts, but reality continues to hit – or bite. The budget crises in Washington state continues to gut higher education, and one of the hardest hit areas at WSU is Extension. Land-grant institutions have a federal mandate to provide Extension services, and this sets WSU and similar universities apart from other state schools. Unfortunately, Extension generates relatively little in terms of outside grants and contracts. Land-grant universities like WSU tend to put their dwindling faculty resources into hiring those who can bring in multi-million dollar grants. And as we’ve bemoaned in past posts, that isn’t in gardening or urban horticulture or arboriculture or any of those great topics that you all love to hear more about.
Let’s look what’s happened with Extension specialists at WSU. Before I came in 2004, the Extension plant pathology specialist had retired. The position was refilled with someone else. The Extension entomology specialist retired last year. His position will be refilled with someone to work with the structural pest control industry (there is some money there). The questions that come from the public are shuffled around among other faculty, who may or may not have some partial appointment in Extension. In any case, the public outreach and education aspect of land grant universities everywhere is taking the back seat to bringing in grant dollars and teaching college students. That means fewer Extension Bulletins published or updated and more reliance on well-funded companies to provide their versions – good or bad – of agricultural sciences.
I’m not going to rail about the idiocy of letting public higher education fail in this country through lack of state funding – I’m sure you can see that for yourselves wherever you live. Instead, I want to point out an effort to gather the remnant state forces to have a national impact.
This year I’ve become associated with eXtension (a national group of Extension personnel) in the Community Horticulture Community of Practice. This is a fledgling effort to construct a national web presence containing relevant, current, science-based information on all things horticultural. If you check out the link above, you can click on Garden Myths, where you’ll find information from…Jeff Gillman and myself.
It’s going to take a long time to get this web resource organized and populated with good information – but it’s a start. If you, or someone you know, is interested in helping, be sure to post a comment or email Karen Jeannette, our intrepid coordinator in Minnesota. (I can provide her email if you are interested.)
We’re on the topic of communication this week…how can Extension personnel communicate best with their audience/stakeholders. It used to be via racks of Xeroxed “Fact Sheets” at your local Extension office. A few of these are said to still exist, but with states gutting their extension budgets, the costs of printing have become prohibitive. And more critically…where do YOU go for information? A musty file full of handouts? Heck no. Electronic media is tailor-made for extension. It’s virtually free, easily updated, and reaches a vast majority of clients. Bert already covered YouTube, as well as posted the BEST extension video ever, courtesy of Utah State. So I shall not be redundant.
At Virginia Tech, we have some folks utilizing the Power of Podcasts to communicate whatever point they’re trying to make. Dr. Mike Goatley, our Turf Extension Specialist, has done especially well with the technology. He presents practical advice in a very user-friendly package. He nearly always cites relevant research. The information presented in the audio file (MP3) is also available in some sort of text format, whether a fact sheet, script, or PowerPoint handout, often with hot links to the research literature cited. You don’t even need an iPod; just click on the link and your media player of choice will open and play the audio.
For today’s example, I’ve selected one of my favorite Goatley-casts… his guide to lawn leaf management entitled “Leave Them Alone.” Effective, informative, and very convincing…all in 4 minutes. Take a look and listen here…
Mike demonstrates with his mulching mower. The safety glasses are a nice touch. I wouldn’t have thought of that.
We recently received a question on one of my old posts (Dec. 12, 2009) from a blog reader in Iran (yes, Iran) regarding agricultural extension and asking what’s new in how we disseminate science-based information. There’s no doubt that things have evolved in agricultrual extension over the years. There’s an old joke: Guy walks into a county extension office and the agent is sitting behind his desk, crying. The visitor asks, “What’s the matter?” Agent replies, “My farmer died.”
Hey, I said it was an old joke, I didn’t say it was a funny one. Point is, the days of field extension agents or campus-based extension personnel going out and holding a farmer’s hand are long gone. While some may still think of dim-witted Hank Kimball on “Green Acres” when they think of extension (go to http://www.hulu.com/watch/140842/green-acres-my-husband-the-rooster-renter if you miss the reference), most university extension is going increasingly high tech. I’m sure each on my colleagues can provide several examples of recent extension innovations in there area. I’ll provide one that we have just launched here at Michigan State.
Obviously the single biggest tool we have for outreach and extension is the internet. Recently, Dr. Pascal Nzokou, one of the lead members of our Christmas tree extension team launched the MSU Christmas Tree Channel on youtube http://www.youtube.com/user/MSUChristmasTrees
On the Christmas tree channel members of our extension team provide short (1 ½ – 4 minute) videos on various aspects of production: site selection, species selection, pest management, irrigation, nutrition.
There are several advantages of using youtube for these types of videos. First, uploading the videos is easy and straightforward. We had a professional shoot the videos and do the editing but anyone with a digital video camera can shoot videos and load them on to youtube. For short videos it’s easy to upload videos for viewing even at HD resolution eliminating the ‘Invisibale Gardener expereince’. Once the video is loaded you can send the link out to people you think will be interested or include the link on your website. People may also find your video using the search feature depending on the information you include in the description. Lastly, most people that use the web regularly are used to searching and viewing on youtube so there’s high consumer acceptance.
Good guesses over the weekend on what caused the twisty looking trunk structure in Friday’s puzzle. Here’s a larger photo:
Nancy and Paul both got this one – it’s two trunks fused together. I have no idea whether the production nursery grew two saplings together on purpose or accidentally, but here’s one reason that this tree might be a problem down the road:
This area is ripe for disease, as water will collect in the crotch. In fact, the area is already discolored and could be diseased already.
One thing I hadn’t noticed when I took the top picture were the price tags on the nearby pots. They say it all – W(hy) O(h) W(hy).
Needless to say, I hope, is that you wouldn’t want to buy this plant.
Here’s the trunk of a Japanese maple I photographed last month at a big box store in Seattle:
Why does the trunk look like this? Answers and more photos on Monday!
A few months ago I was interviewed for an article where they asked me whether I thought that a deer repellant which was taken up into a tree would be a good idea. I said sure, great idea. It would last a long time — something that most repellants currently don’t. Well, I just saw the article and I must say that I’m not so sure that it’s a great idea any more.
It seems that the repellant that they’re talking about is basically a combination of hot peppers and DMSO. The hot peppers have been around for a long time. The DMSO not so long — just a few decades really (though there is very small quantity of naturally occurring DMSO in fruits) but DMSO has some properties that concern me. When I was younger I was a competitive runner and I recall certain other runners using DMSO as a treatment for aches and pains. I also remember a run-down house along one of my regular runs selling the stuff via a cardboard sign on the porch. Looked kinda shady. I haven’t seen much DMSO around recently, maybe because it isn’t legal everywhere — at least as far as I can tell.
DMSO is a solvent which crosses membranes, such as skin, very easily. Apparently, if you use it anywhere on your body, it will make your breath garlicy. In terms of toxicity — it isn’t considered very toxic. However, it has the ability to dissolve things, such as poisons (the insecticide imidacloprid for example), and anything which it dissolves can then cross the skin barrier very rapidly right along with the DMSO.
So to me this is a little worrying. I don’t have much experience with DMSO, and I don’t have a problem with professional pesticide applicators who have the proper equipment applying DMSO, but I can’t help but wonder whether this stuff might be just a little too tempermental for the average homeowner to use. Apparently the EPA has it now. Here’s hoping that they’ll make the right decision, whatever that is.
A week or so ago my new friend Doug wondered about some gardening advice on the radio: would adding vodka to paperwhite narcissus make the flowers less “floppy?” The explanation he’d heard was that alcohol would burn the roots and reduce stem growth. Then today I received an email newsletter with the same intriguing information. This newsletter referred to a 2006 article that appeared in HortTechnology as the source of this information.
The study by Miller and Finan has generated a lot of interest in the gardening community, especially this time of year as people get ready to force bulbs for indoor blooms. Unfortunately, that enthusiasm isn’t evident among researchers. Neither the original authors nor any other researchers have continued this work; the HortTechnology paper has never been cited in any subsequent publication.
This is unfortunate – because inquiring minds want to know WHY alcohol causes narcissus stems to be shorter. Miller and Finan hypothesize that it’s simply an osmotic effect and allude to preliminary data that support this, “but additional work will be needed for confirmation.”
So I’ve looked into other scientific articles about ethanol and roots for insights into this phenomenon. There’s nothing on narcissus, but others have studied trees, forsythia, tomato and barley reactions to root-zone ethanol. In all of these cases, exposure to ethanol resulted in reduced root growth, decreased water uptake, and reduced leaf transpiration.
How does this translate to shorter stems and leaves? A reduction in water uptake and movement through the plant – that is, from roots through the stems and out of the leaves – can reduce movement of growth regulators like cytokinins from roots to stems and leaves. It can also mean that the plant contains less water and is less turgid as a result. Both growth regulators and cell turgidity are important in cell division and elongation. Reduced cell expansion will cause stems and leaves to be shorter and/or smaller as a result. This same phenomenon can be seen in plants grown under saline or droughty conditions: these plants are always smaller than their normal counterparts.
So what your grandmother used to warn you about is true – alcohol WILL stunt your growth!
I’m going to add a bit more to Bert’s discussion. Through the efforts of Dr. Eric Wiseman of Urban Forestry at Virginia Tech, we have a
Utility Line Arboretum (ULA). Modeled after Dr. Bonnie Appleton’s original ULA for Virginia at the Hampton Roads research station, Eric’s includes many woody taxa suitable for planting in the vicinity of power lines (see a nice list of Bonnie’s favorite power-line-friendly taxa here).
Eric came to me with his plan in 2006 and we found some space in our Hahn Horticulture Garden to get it going. Funding came through from both the Virginia Department of Forestry and the USDA. He’s now up to 50+ specimens, including a “no-no” tree for a demonstration of relative size. The Urban Forestry Club students maintain the site and Eric uses the ULA for both education and outreach. Our hort garden visitors are free to wander through the well-labeled display. Interesting story: obviously, this would be more effective with a faux power line for scale, like Bonnie has at Hampton Roads. Our campus architect said “heck no.” Apparently Virginia Tech has gone to great lengths and expense to get all power lines/utilities below ground. And the ULA is adjacent to the much-visited baseball field.
That’s Eric on the right, demonstrating proper planting techniques.
Our Horticulture department has a great relationship with Forestry; especially the Urban Forestry section. Their students take our Landscape Establishment and Urban Horticulture courses and we encourage our landscape contracting students to take Arboriculture. Several are minoring in Urban Forestry (or vice-versa). Just thought I’d share a nice success story – one that should make Bert’s maligned arborists happy!
One of our semi-recurring themes on the Garden Professor’s is our WOW’s or “Why Oh Why’s”. As in “Why oh why do nurseries continue to sell invasive plants?” Today, I’d like to turn things around a bit and look at a group of people that are often maligned by the public but, in fact, are getting a bad rap and could use a break; utility arborists.
Right tree, right place?
Utility arborists face a nearly impossible and unenviable task. The goal of every electrical utility is to provide safe, uninterrupted power to their customers. What do their customers do in return? Plant large, fast growing trees under powerlines. This invariably necessitates line-clearance pruning and, in some cases, tree removal. So who takes the wrath of the neighborhood? The oblivious homeowner who planted a row of Norway spruces under the lines? Or the trained professional arborist that does the trimming?
Betcha can’t top this…
Among the arborists with whom I interact, utility arborists are often the best trained and the most professional. They have to be. An amateur pruning around electrical lines suspended 50’ in the air in a bucket lift is virtually guaranteed a Darwin Award nomination. Arborists can’t even win when they try to do the right thing. Many utility forestry programs utilize directional pruning as an alternative to topping or removing trees. When done properly, directional pruning allow trees to coexist with powerlines and enables neighborhoods to continue to benefit from large trees. A survey by Mike Kuhns at Utah State a few years ago, however, found that homeowners actually preferred the look of a topped tree to a tree that had been directionally pruned. Granted, directional pruning isn’t always pretty but it’s vastly preferable to topping or removal.
The utility arborists I know are dedicated and ‘tree people’ in the best sense. If they lived in a perfect world, the right tree would always be planted in the right place. Since it’s not they have to rely on techniques like directional pruning to help ensure safe and uninterrupted power. So give ‘em a break.