We had a decent turnout on the webinar yesterday – saw a few names from our blog readers there. I hope everyone was able to see and hear the presentation and didn’t have any technical difficulties? If you did, please let me know so we can fix them for next time. For those of you who weren’t able to attend, it’s been archived for viewing at your leisure.
I used suggestions that readers suggested on the blog to demonstrate how to search academic databases for science-based information on products and practices related to gardening. So if you’re curious to know whether wireworms can be controlled naturally using bait traps, or whether hydrogen peroxide as a soil drench will prevent damping off off seedlings, or whether mowing leaves into the lawn is a good practice…you’ll have to watch!
Very well done. I enjoyed this over that conference call mess. I mean the technology of course – *cough-cough*
Oh and I like that new phrase – “The Good, The Bad, and the Otherwise” Sounds like the Spaghetti western of landscaping – *smile*
Linda, this looks great. Are your slides available via Slideshare or elsewhere? Would like to share with some people who would find the idea of a webinar a bit daunting.
Great idea Fiona! It’s on Slideshare now under LindaCS. Thanks for the suggestion.
Thanks Linda. Now that I’ve had a chance to see the webinar, I do have another question.
What criteria would you recommend for evaluating the quality of a publication? I hear a lot about impact factor, but I also hear a lot about ‘funky’ (your word:) journals that really aren’t peer-reviewed, etc. Any tips?
Fiona, the ISI Web of Science database also calculates an impact factor, which is somewhat helpful though it unfairly discounts (in my opinion) young journals and those with a narrow focus. As far as the “funky” or possibly less reliable journals, I would include those with a limited distribution (i.e. only for a particular country) and those that aren’t peer-reviewed. It’s easy to figure these last ones out – just go to the website for the journal and see what their instructions to authors are. These will explicitly state whether papers are peer-reviewed.
Is there a way to listen to the audio portion of your slide presentation? If so, I can’t seem to find it.
Lynne, the audio is embedded in the archived presentation. If you’re not hearing it, it might be your computer settings.